Propaganda Alert !!! - Zogby Poll: 52% Support U.S. Military Strike Against Iran

More Orwellian newspeak from the government Zogby polling puppet and controlled media! Are we being psychologically prepared to accept a near future attack on Iran? Is this another psy-op being conducted on the American people? Let's examine Zogby's findings from their own article.

It is no secret that the Neo-Cons are salivating at the prospect of a lucrative (for the military-industrial complex, and big oil) pre-emptive attack on Iran. It is just a little too convenient that Zogby comes along with this poll that flies in the face of previous surveys that show Americans are against the war by 73 percent.

Anti-war sentiment is high. (70 + percent against war depending upon the pollster) Are we to believe that Americans suddenly changed their minds and now favor more war? This is an incredible revelation; not to mention convenient! I know of no one who favors a strike on Iran. Where do they get these people who say they favor a pre-emptive strike on Iran? Are they oil company and arms manufacturer CEO's?

Released: October 29, 2007

Read the full story here:
Zogby Poll: 52% Support U.S. Military Strike Against Iran

{The first paragraph of the article begins with this:}

Most see Clinton (the anti-war candidate?) as the presidential candidate best equipped to deal with Iran, followed by Giuliani and McCain—but many express uncertainty

A majority of likely voters – 52% – would support a U.S. military strike to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon, and 53% believe it is likely that the U.S. will be involved in a military strike against Iran before the next presidential election, a new Zogby America telephone poll shows.

The survey results come at a time of increasing U.S. scrutiny of Iran. According to reports from the Associated Press, earlier this month Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice accused Iran of "lying" about the aim of its nuclear program and Vice President Dick Cheney has raised the prospect of "serious consequences" if the U.S. were to discover Iran was attempting to develop a nuclear weapon. Last week, the Bush administration also announced new sanctions against Iran.

{Please note the paragraph above which further serves to puff (MSM term for promote) the pre-emptive attack scenario in the public psyche. Isn't this the same pretext we heard just before the Iraq war? Will they fool us again?}

Democrats (63%) are most likely to believe a U.S. military strike against Iran could take place in the relatively near future, but independents (51%) and Republicans (44%) are less likely to agree. Republicans, however, are much more likely to be supportive of a strike (71%), than Democrats (41%) or independents (44%). Younger likely voters are more likely than those who are older to say a strike is likely to happen before the election and women (58%) are more likely than men (48%) to say the same – but there is little difference in support for a U.S. strike against Iran among these groups.

{Note the last line in the paragraph above, the key words being - support, U.S. strike, Iran. Why did they focus on the support for the proposed attack instead of opposition which is much greater in some of the groups mentioned above? This is classical propaganda!}

When asked which presidential candidate would be best equipped to deal with Iran – regardless of whether or not they expected the U.S. to attack Iran – 21% would most like to see New York U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton leading the country, while 15% would prefer former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani and 14% would want Arizona U.S. Sen. John McCain in charge. Another 10% said Illinois Sen. Barack Obama would be best equipped to deal with Iran, while Republican Fred Thompson (5%), Democrat John Edwards (4%) and Republican Mitt Romney (3%) were less likely to be viewed as the best leaders to help the U.S. deal with Iran. The telephone poll of 1,028 likely voters nationwide was conducted Oct. 24-27, 2007 and carries a margin of error of +/- 3.1 percentage points.

{Pretty handy that the supposed "anti-war" candidate who consistently voted for the war in Iraq has been identified as the one Americans would like most to prosecute the pre-emptive strike on Iran! This is meant to soften our view on an attack since Hillary is supposedly anti-war. }

----- snip -----

There is considerable division about when a strike on Iran should take place – if at all. Twenty-eight percent believe the U.S. should wait to strike until after the next president is in office while 23% would favor a strike before the end of President Bush’s term. Another 29% said the U.S. should not attack Iran, and 20% were unsure...

{"Another 29% said the U.S. should not attack Iran," This makes it look like only a small minority are against the attack on Iran.}

As the possibility the U.S. may strike Iran captures headlines around the world, many have given thought to the possibility of an attack at home. Two in three (68%) believe it is likely that the U.S. will suffer another significant terrorist attack on U.S. soil comparable to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001...

{The paragraph above is the signature line of the indoctrination. (the final thought the reader is left with) In short it translates into "let's attack them before they attack us" propaganda.}

The dead give-away that this is a propaganda piece is that it is slanted (to say the least) in the direction of the pro-war cabal who control the White House. The only question that now remains is will we be duped again into another unsustainable, bungling, and deadly war by these dangerous Neo-Cons and their useful idiots in the media?

Now ad to this the fact that the Selective Service System has been ramping up its ability to begin a draft since the Spring of 2005, This is especially a possibility should Congressional Bills S. 89 and H.R. 163, known as the "Universal National Service Act of 2003" pass in the House and Senate.

This time around, a draft would include men and women, and the age limit has been increased to expand the available pool of conscripts. We will need far more troops if we attack Iran.

We can thank Mr. RANGEL Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. STARK, and Mr. ABERCROMBIE for introducing S. 89 and H.R. 163; the pro-war "Universal National Service Act."

Do you remember this recent story? Bush asks Congress for $46 billion more for wars Does Bush know something we don't?

Let us not forget about the missing nuke from this story 6 Nukes Fly Over The US - Big Problems With This Story! And then there was this: Bush Threatens World War Three - With Nukes Can this all just be coincidence?

A corroborating and disturbing article from the Herald:

Secret move to upgrade air base for Iran attack plans
IAN BRUCE, Defence Correspondent
October 29 2007

"
The US is secretly upgrading special stealth bomber hangars on the British island protectorate of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean in preparation for strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, according to military sources.

The improvement of the B1 Spirit jet infrastructure coincides with an "urgent operational need" request for £44m to fit racks to the long-range aircraft.

That would allow them to carry experimental 15-ton Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bombs designed to smash underground bunkers buried as much as 200ft beneath the surface through reinforced concrete."

They are quietly getting all of their i's dotted and t's crossed before the next war. All of the political players (both Democrat and Republican) are ready willing and able (according to the propaganda piece above) to pre-emptively attack Iran.

The plan is in place, the propaganda is here, the war is eminent.

We can bomb the world to pieces, but we can't bomb it into peace - Michael Franti

RON PAUL WE NEED YOU !!!

Politics And The Pleasure Principle (Pt 1)

Dear visitor, Welcome! Let me begin by asking you (the one for whom this site was made) a few questions about some of the great paradoxes of our day. These are probably questions which you have not considered, but they are critically important. What you are about to learn is probably not like anything you have ever seen or heard before.

How could it be that with the ever growing armies of counselors and psychology “experts” the toll of broken relationships (and their fallout; depression, substance abuse etc.) is rising aggressively with no cures on the horizon? Why is it that after tens of thousands of self help books, tapes, CD’s, lectures, courses, and seminars have tried to solve our problems the problems just keep getting worse? They have not delivered, but, then why should the social gurus want to solve any problems? It would be counterproductive for them to put an end to people‘s problems, they would lose all of the power and control they have diligently worked for.

Some of us have successfully overcome our problems in life, but it is largely in spite of the “masters” not because of them.

There are many more profound social paradoxes which have cropped up in our generation which we will discuss later. For now I would like you, the thoughtful reader to ponder these ironies as we progress through the thesis of this course and put the pieces of the puzzle together. As we discover the answers the reasons will become obvious, and take shape in your mind.

The Pleasure Principle

The philosophy of pleasure was most advocated by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) , whose utilitarianism embraced the notion that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number" was the only meaningful, scientific, consistent criterion of good and evil. (Thus excising the wisdom of wiser generations) Bentham upheld a psychological hedonism in which pleasure is the goal of all purposive behaviour. He attempted to work out a "felicific calculus" in which the value of a given unit of pleasure (or pain) could be calculated by judging it for qualities like intensity, duration, certainty or uncertainty, propinquity or remoteness, fecundity, purity, and the extent of number of persons affected.

Bentham believed that such a "felicific calculus" would be practically useful in assessing rational scales of punishment (too little pain would not deter; too much would unnecessarily detract from utility). Bentham's pleasure-pain theory was hedonistic, secular, and individualisitc. Even broadly sympathetic critics, like John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), berated it for failing to make allowance for different qualities of happiness -- "higher" and "lower" pleasures.
Crude utilitarianism thus made no allowance for self-perfection. Moreover, psychologically speaking, Mill believed that the conscious pursuit of pleasure was necessarily self-defeating.

Psychological Hedonism During the last two centuries

psychological hedonism has become the bedrock of many theories of human (and animal) behaviour, including Behaviourist psychology. Within evolutionary biology, the pursuit of sensory happiness in the guise of survival, and the survival of the fittest, forms a key mechanism.

A Basic Instinct For Sigmund Freud

(1856-1939), pleasure was a basic instinct, initially taking the form of sexual gratification or libido. Since full pursuit of the "pleasure principle" appears incompatible with civilized order, the drive of pleasure is either thwarted (causing neurosis) or sublimated into art, religion, work and other creative or productive activity. Thus Freud, and by extension modern values, in many respects reversed the priorities of earlier theologians and philosophers. They saw happiness, based on higher values, as the experience of truth, and hedonism as a kind of illusion, or at least less valuable. Freud, by contrast, saw the drive for sensory and sexual gratification as the ultimate truth about the human animal.

These views have become pervasive in modern literature, psychology, academia and even politics. These peddlers of perversion (past and present) are using the Pleasure Principle, a powerful and destructive principle virtually unknown in full by the layman to subvert the hearts and minds of our populace. To most of the uninformed it sounds avant garde, and even chic. It is anything but avant garde or chic, it is fiendish and extremely manipulative.

Most Americans (and westerners) have been seduced by it’s powerful allure without any general awareness. Surely you have noticed the glorification of casual sex, materialism, violence, alcohol, drugs, and ignorance in movies, on television, in today's “music” and advertisements. These are the signs of the Pleasure Principle at work in a self centered culture.

Surely you have been to the local stores lately and seen, if not read the popular magazine- SELF. Are you aware of what self magazine is about? You guessed it. It is all about self.

"The man who lives for self alone,
lives for the meanest mortal known." - Cinncinatus

"This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves..." - 2 Timothy 3(vs 1,2)

What are the signs of selfishness? Well, one is gratification or in more modern parlance, instant gratification. People want their MTV and they want it now.

Another outward manifestation of selfishness is materialism. Materialistic people are selfish, and selfish people are materialistic.

MTV appeals very much to the materialistic self. Vulgar gangster rappers are somehow held up as icons to our youth. No other culture would have made them as tremendously wealthy and famous as our self-centered, and materialistic pop sub-culture. These rappers personify superficial selfishness in the extreme with their big gold chains, expensive cars, and luxurious mansions filled with servants, and let’s not forget the scantily clad groupies. You couldn’t come up with worse role models from any other generation in all history. On this point our generation is again unfortunately unique from all others before us.

SELF-ESTEEM = SELF LOVE

One of the most damaging buzz words being crooned and crowed from the ivory towers of academia is “self-esteem” The academic “elite” know full well that when it is administered in heavy doses to immature minds the resulting outcome will be self-love. The children have been well indoctrinated as we shall see.

Another sign of a self serving culture is hedonistic slogans. Have we not become a sloganeering society? Do the following examples sound familiar?

Show me the money

Sex, drugs, rock and roll

If it feels good do it

Party on dude!

Go for the gusto

Supersize me!

Of course there are many more, you could probably come up with a few of your own without giving it much thought.

The dangerous invasions of hedonism in popular culture have taken a heavy toll. Never in history has drug abuse, violence, unmarried pregnancies obesity and personal debt (due to materialism) been so high.

The Pleasure Principle in short goes like this: Give the first dose of pleasure, get them hooked, after the fix has worn off there will be a vacuum and thus a demand for more. But, the flesh is not content for long at this dosage and will eventually require more as the addiction to pleasure progresses. Before long you have junkies seeking higher highs chasing that initial rush which will never be filled. The pleasure fades and desire increases. The addiction becomes ever more ravenous and more extreme measures are taken to achieve fulfillment.

Those on the treadmill of the Pleasure Principle demand change from their leaders, the old ways are despised because they threaten the pleasure fix which a large portion of the public demands. They demand their pornography, materialism, drugs, unmarried sex, and government safety net.

Have you noticed that the slogans for democratic politicians almost always promise change? Bill Clinton used change in his election bid as did John Kerry. Another code word for change used today is progressive. The progressives offer a promise that change is on the way. What they really mean is that they will fight for your right to party. Tragically for many the Pleasure Principle will ultimately end in emptiness and self-destruction.

It is very much like the method used by the Eskimos to kill a wolf. The Eskimo’s take a very sharp knife and dip it into a bucket of blood. They take it out and allow it to freeze to the blade. This process is repeated numerous times until the blade is surrounded by a block of frozen blood. Then, they bury the knife in the snow with the blade up and the block of blood exposed to tempt the wolf. Upon catching the scent of the blood the wolf quickly makes his way over and begins licking the block. The more the wolf licks the bloody block the more blood is yielded and eventually the wolf becomes so ravenous in his blood lust that it doesn’t realize that it’s own tongue has been slashed off and it is gorging on it’s own blood. Soon the wolf dies of shock and blood loss gorged mostly on it’s own blood.

Like the wolf in the story above many of us have become ravenous in our hedonistic extravagances and have had to declare bankruptcy, check into some abuse program, or even worse committed suicide. This all due to the fiendish exploiters behind the Pleasure Principle.
Unfortunately modern psychology has done too little too late to counter the devastating effects of the Pleasure Principle. Sure, they have clinics for those of us who fall prey, but this is like putting an ambulance at the bottom of a cliff. If they really wanted to “help” us wouldn’t they put a fence at the top of the cliff instead of an ambulance below? In many cases the ambulance below is of no use, the patient is DOA. Societies have always put up fences before reaching the edge of the Pleasure Principle cliff, but the liberals are now tearing them down.

The very rich like the “Material Girl” Madonna were given a very large block off of which to lick, and their demise will come later than sooner. There is therefore this illusion to the rest of us in the pack that it is ok to lick the block set out by the progressives. The problem is that Madonna’s block is so thick it may last her nearly a lifetime, our blocks will not be so thick, we will reach the blade sooner than later. Don't be deceived, the Pleasure Principle will destroy everyone eventually.

Through the media’s indoctrination in the Pleasure Principle we have learned to substitute love for lust, prosperity for greed, and happiness for temporary ravenous fixes. It is time to get off the pop culture peddler’s treadmill and replace the baser motives and desires with the more noble dreams of the heart which do bring true satisfaction.

In 2002 a standardized aptitude test was given to high school students in fifteen different nations. The U.S. being one of them. As you may have heard our students did the worst out of all fifteen nations, even Ugandan students out scored us.

The interesting and telling part is the part which was unreported in the major media, and largely swept under the rug by academicians. In the math portion of the test one of the questions was “Are you good at math?” The Koreans who did the best in the world said no by 76% Our students who did the worst said yes by 68%. The difference is that the Koreans are not indoctrinated with the selfish and hedonistic feel good philosophy of self-esteem.

So, what can we learn from the example above? Self-esteem transformed them (our children) into braggarts, unable and unwilling to identify their own ignorance. The apostle Paul put it well when he wrote about the “last days” generation in Romans 1:22. “Professing themselves to be wise they became fools” Does this sound like our indoctrinated students above?

The generation known as generation X has been pre-programmed by the annointed social engineers for coming social change through the public school “curriculum.” Instead of teaching reading, writing, and arithmetic they have substituted politically correct propaganda. It’s no wonder that 40% of graduates today are functionally illiterate.

We as parents did not guard their hearts and minds, and they have been corrupted under our noses by psycho political destroyers. They love themselves too much, and are too ignorant to rationally judge or appraise their own abysmal lack of knowledge. Instead they congratulate themselves that they are so smart. Professing themselves to be wise they have become fools.
This is the direct result of feel good psychology. The fact that they feel good tells us something very important. These affected students have been converted from thinking and rational to feeling and irrational (emotional) individuals more likely to follow the dark winds of progressivism.

With maturity and reason now stunted the highway to hedonism is slickly paved.

The change agents are winning the war. What war? Howard Stern nailed it when he referred to it as the culture war. Dear reader, you may not see it as a war, but they do! They are determined to win. Get involved and make a difference! Let's put the fence back on the edge of the Pleasure Principle cliff.

If The Left Had Their Way In The USA

Dear reader does the heavy hand of power in America cause you private distress? Can you feel the stress fractures growing between the government and the governed? If you answered yes to the above then you are my favorite audience with whom I would like very much to dialogue.

Just now, as we speak there are forces and factions asserting supremacy in our land with gloomy forebodings. The attacks from within are designs for power carefully Pre-meditated to subvert our republic and deliver us into a new paradigm not of our choosing.

These factions of which I speak (and their adherents) are amongst us, we see them everyday. They are the fomenters of such divisive issues as: the illegal alien invasion, global warming, abortion, gay rights, rights of property ownership, gun control, and many others ad nauseum.

They start many fires on different fronts simultaneously whether it be amnesty for illegals or gay marriage, or more gun control, or lowering the age of sexual consent. From coast to coast the good people are engaged in hundreds of battles to extinguish these fires at any one time. They keep starting so many fires that we cannot seem to get to the big fire. Who are these arsonists of American ideals? Generally speaking they are liberals, politically speaking they are Democrats, and ideologically speaking they are Marxist/communists.

What is the big fire that we should have put out long ago? Communism! We should have diligently guarded our schools (and other compromised institutions) It is particularly in the schools that they made their most important inroads. It is well known that - who controls the schools controls the world.

What ever happened to the old arsonists of American ideals - the Communist Party USA? They simply and seamlessly assimilated into the Democratic party. Communism is perhaps a mere abstraction to the younger generation who were never taught in our public schools that it was directly responsible for the slaughter of over 120 million human beings. Communism is a dirty word to informed Americans and they know it, so they have changed labels to escape detection by the majority. The new labels are; secular humanist, and progressive.

Although the communists have changed names, they have not changed agendas or given up! No, they will never stop pushing. Evil never rests. Their assault upon life, liberty, happiness and prosperity will never stop, it is anathema to them. (Unless it is an assault upon their own)

Do my assertions sound harsh? If ever there was a time to unveil the enemy arsonists within it is now! For far too long they have couched their wicked intrigues in soothing warm fuzzy sounding words which the gullible and ignorant heartily embraced. For instance it is under the banner of "caring for the children" that the arsonists have eliminated rights of parental notification in some states. When an underage child has an abortion or is to be administered psychotropic "behavior modification" drugs in schools the parents need not be notified and have absolutely no say in these matters according to activist judge rulings that stand in many states.

They will not stop there. The ACLU (arsonists at large) have many fires stoked to assault "antiquated" notions of liberty and morality. Occasionally they will take a case in defense of the Constitution, but this is only window dressing, they are still the sworn enemies of liberty.

Perhaps to many readers I assert a known truth that the enemy within seeks the destruction and abolition of America and the western world along with it's people and culture. What follows will be a penetrating look under the veil to expose the enemy for what they truly are and what they plan for you and I. We shall not speculate nor invoke hyperbole regarding their objectives. We shall let them speak for themselves, as it is far more damning than anything I could put on the table.

Knowing that actions speak louder than words let's make a cursory observation of the enemy within's past and present actions to deduce from there just what plans they may have for us. Please bear in mind that we are not speaking of moderate Democrats who have been thoroughly marginalized and demonized within their own party i.e. Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut.

What would America look like if the enemy within (the far left) had their way? The following is based on past and current pushes by the left and their operatives. Note: an asterisk * after the entry indicates that this is already happening in parts of the US. By the way can anyone identify which of the following promotes liberty and prosperity?

• No private gun ownership for any reason *
• No conservative talk radio
• No private property rights
• No restrictions on illegal immigration *
• Free abortions at any age or stage of pregnancy *
• State control of minors superseding parental rights *
• Lower age of sexual consent to 12 years
• Elimination of the death penalty *
• Unrestricted health care for illegals *
• Social Security benefits for illegals *
• Hate speech laws - make it a felony to hurt some one's feelings (except Christians)
• No Boy Scouts of America
• No prison for pedophiles - just "restorative justice" (better known as therapy) *
• Legalization or "decriminalization" of street drugs *
• Gay marriage
• Abolition of the institution of marriage (if gay marriage is not accepted)
• Homosexual death style taught to children of all ages *
• Activist judges legislating from the bench overturning the Constitution and the will of the people *
• Remove "harsh punishment" for dangerous criminals, replace with "restorative justice" *
• Free and universal health care
• Extreme taxation
• Restrictive almost insurmountable legislation, ordinances, regulations, standards, taxes, and fees on private businesses *
• Centralization of governmental powers *
• Bigger government
• Expanded entitlements at taxpayer expense
• No home schooling
• Reduced military spending and readiness
• Increased government police powers *
• Habeas corpus eliminated (currently on the books by Executive Order, but not in force)
• Presumption of innocence eliminated (return to Napoleonic law in accordance with most other nations)
• International laws and jurist precedents superseding US Constitution *
• Stripping of US sovereignty *
• Pro-Constitutionalists are labeled anti-government (an old communist tactic to poison public opinion) *
• Threats to government and any official will be a crime *
• The middle-class will be eliminated and everyone (except those in power) will be made equal
• Social engineering programs of tolerance, diversity, and self-esteem taught in schools and given higher priority than the three R's *
• Rampant, unparalleled illiteracy in schools *
• Big sister surveillance and spy society *
• Perpetual wars *
• Police state
• State control of all media and communications
• State control of agriculture
• State control of transportation
• State control of schools *
• State control of health care
• State control of industry
• State control of all resources

After reviewing the list above can you identify any item which is a plank of true conservatism? The Neo-cons are not, I say again, they are not conservatives!!! They are well dressed wolves in sheep's clothing, willing to toss us a conservative bone now and then. Just look at their actions and know that there is nothing conservative about them.

The Neo-cons (heavy emphasis on the cons) are fellow travelers of the communists. How can I say this? Easy, they have given us: unrestricted illegal immigration, undeclared wars, (unconstitutional) bigger government, higher spending, No Child Left Behind (written up by Teddy Kennedy) loss of private property rights, (the infamous Kelo decision) and Executive Orders for martial law, continuity of government, suspension of Habeas Corpus and much more.

Up until this point we have appraised the direction our nation is heading based upon known facts that are mostly common knowledge and are in the public domain. Now let's exercise a little journalistic discretion and read between the lines of the developments and circumstances leading up to where we are today, they will prove to be full of interest!

Humor me for a moment and let's pretend that our officials in government are rational human beings. Most of our elected officials are intelligent and well educated but devoid of principle.

When you read stories concerning the government's refusal to secure the borders and enforce our immigration laws do you just file it away under government bungling, corruption, or misplaced political correctness as the media elites direct you to? Is this really just the outcome of rational leadership who's only fault is "caring so much" for the illegal aliens as many claim? Is it possible that this was planned and a much more treacherous agenda is underfoot?

When we observe that all western nations have welcomed militant illegals from third world nations all at the same time in history the argument that this is all coincidence begins to evaporate. Now, let us add another bit of irony, and that is the fact that non-western nations do not allow much legal and certainly not illegal immigration. It starts to look suspiciously like a plan.

In case you missed it western nations are bringing in militant illegals and legals from third world nations who refuse to assimilate. The Europeans have their Muslims and we have Mexicans and Latin Americans. The cultures of the opposing parties mentioned above do not mix. The cultural divide is too wide and never the twain shall meet. The cultures of western nations and third world nations are polar extremes. To the third world mindset racism is a good thing, and corruption is a way of life.

We have been indoctrinated in our government schools to believe that all cultures are equal. This is nonsense! Just ask one of these idiot teachers if Nazi culture is equal to Polynesian or American Indian cultures, and see if they don't become upset with you. Why would they get upset? Because, you caught them in a lie, you dared exposed the propaganda machine and they resent it!

What are the chances that multi-culturalism, diversity training, and unchecked immigration from hostile third world nations could all occur in the same generation in only the western nations? The answer can only be that it was engineered! Are unseen forces conspiring? You bet!

What is the goal of these unseen forces? Western nations are the engines of liberty, prosperity, innovation and self-determination. Did I mention liberty? You cannot rule over a free people. If world government is the goal you must remove the fly from the globalist ointment, and that fly is the western nations and in particular the United States of America.

Most observers say follow the money and it will lead you to the perpetrators of the immigration crisis. They say "always follow the money." This is wrong and misleading. Money does not motivate tyrants, power does. Hitler couldn't have cared less about money. He was motivated by power, as are our government shills who are in on this treachery.

The only plausible answer is that there is a concerted effort to destroy our culture and middle class from within and without. What follows in the video below is proof that our government is working to undermine our culture. These US school children were given Mexican flags and made to recite the Pledge of Allegiance to the Mexican flag! What you are witnessing is the blatant destruction of our culture by our government using our tax dollars against us.



According to a Pew poll 60 percent of illegals believe that America was stolen from them by the gringos. We know this to be false. Why is it being taught in our schools in California and Texas? Just one more bit of evidence that treachery is afoot!

Ladies and gentlemen please note the clear message in the above scene from the illegal demonstrations. The US flag is upside down signifying distress. The Mexican flag flying above the US flag meaning victory. Do you see the big piñata in the foreground? - Illegals from Mexico refer to the US as the "Big Piñata" Now let's get something straight here; these illegal students didn't just think all of this symbolism up on their own. This is clearly staged by higher-ups. The message being communicated here is; We have conquered the Big Piñata. Perhaps these school officials should be held accountable for allowing the US flag to be desecrated on government property. Our lack of resistance to attacks such as this only emboldens them. They see our empathy, compassion, and failure to act as cowardice, and weakness which makes them despise us even more. One last important point here. Who do you think helped stage this treasonous photo op? I don't know for sure who did, but I know who did not. It was not conservatives! This is one more piece to the puzzle that fits.

Illegal immigration from hostile nations is the seed of the coming race war and political correctness is the water which will make it grow.

Unfortunately we are allowing these transgressions to occur making us partly to blame for our own demise. As the great historian Seymour Lipset said, "Great nations don't die, they commit national suicide."

Are the government operatives trying to start a race war? The Mexicans have many organizations which promote this "reconquista" thinking. Millions of them are members. What they are proposing is insurrection and high treason. If you or I were to form a movement to overthrow the government the unsparing hand of the law would smash us in no time. Why doesn't the government shut them down and throw them in prison? Is our government complicit? You bet they are. You liberals can blame government bungling and ineptitude to deflect closer scrutiny, but one day the people will know they were deliberately betrayed by their own government.

Why are these illegals so heavily armed? This is the reason all Americans should be armed and dangerous!

Many believe that the tensions between the Mexicans and Americans will eventually lead to a race war. Right now tensions are too low, but what if there were an economic turndown. Could this be the right catalyst to spark a race war? Who would benefit from such a scenario? Well, well, well what do you know it would benefit the government just as they expected!

Once a race war flared up the government would pounce upon the opportunity to declare martial law and disarm Americans resulting in a blood bath since the undocumented illegals will still have undocumented weapons.

"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~ Thomas Jefferson (This is why Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton want gun control so badly.)

Once the "evil white racists" are out of the way the government operatives can bring on their version of communism. This'll be a strange mix of fascism and communism with mega corporations intact. It will also be totalitarian Shangri-la given birth by unprecedented carnage, an offering to the god of the new age.

It doesn't have to go this way. We outnumber them and their sympathizers by at least 50 to 1.

“There can be no really pervasive system of oppression . . . without the consent of the oppressed” Florynce R. Kennedy

Sound like a far-fetched scenario? I sure hope so! I have never wanted to be wrong on anything so much in my entire life.

One last word. To be forewarned is to be forearmed. Don't ever give up your guns! Fight for your people, your culture, your nation. Love your countrymen, the rest of the world certainly won't. You must decide now if you will fight or role over in hopes that you might survive. As for me it is better to fight standing up than bow as a slave! Decide now! It will be too late when they come breaking through your door.

P.S. - At the time of this writing the Mexican truckers have been given the green light to haul freight unchecked within the US. I don't feel any good (for Americans) can come of this! Will the media tell us when Americans are killed needlessly by Mexican truckers? Will they tell us when US truckers lose their jobs to Mexican competition? Judging by past coverups of illegal crime I doubt very much the government or the media will report on this issue impartially.

      

      

UN: Meat The Lead Cause Of Global Warming!

Just when you were sure it was the evil SUV's causing global warming the UN comes with a report blaming our consumption of meat. Read the article here Not to be outdone by the UN the ultra-leftist People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has offered a not so surprising solution.

The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization issued a report stating that the livestock business generates more greenhouse gas emissions than all forms of transportation combined. Wow! More than all forms of transportation combined? I am speechless, not really. That's the sort of stuff I've come to expect from the most corrupt bureaucracy on the planet.




They (PETA) offer lots of salient gems such as: "Environmentalists are still pointing their fingers at Hummers and SUVs when they should be pointing at the dinner plate," said Matt Prescott, manager of vegan campaigns for PETA.


The UN and animal rights groups who almost always overlap in their missions, have coalesced around a message that eating meat is worse for the environment than driving. They and smaller groups have started advertising campaigns that try to equate vegetarianism with curbing greenhouse gases. But hold on just a second, is this good science?

What causes flatulence? (the most evil, destructive and offensive of greenhouse gases) Could
the proposed cure cause more flatulent emissions than it is meant to eliminate, thereby worsening "runaway global warming"? You bet it will, but that won't stop them, they won't even flinch.

The agenda should be clear by now-Eliminate the west's standard of living which they have worked hard for and redistribute the wealth to those who will not work.

Matt Prescott said that his group had written to more than 700 environmental groups, asking them to promote vegetarianism, and that it would soon distribute leaflets that highlight the effect of eating meat on global warming. He also said "You just cannot be a meat-eating environmentalist." Sounds a bit tyrannical to me. These people are all the same, they will not live and let live. They want control-they are control freaks! The most evil and destructive of human character disorders. They are little Hitlers willing to lie, kill, steal and more to control the thoughts and lives of others.

Now we will demolish their argument that vegetarianism will curb green house gas emissions. How will the proposed conversion of all people to the vegan lifestyle increase the flatulent green house emissions? Let's use a little basic science mixed with a little common sense.

Let us assume that over 6 billion people convert to a near vegan lifestyle. Bear in mind that there will still be most livestock left in the world since we will still need wool, leather, lanolin, milk, cheese, pet food, and other indispensable animal products.

We will only be able to reduce the current livestock population by 50 million or so. At the same time there will be 6 billion plus vegans. So for every cow eliminated we will have roughly 120 vegans.

Just a side note. In another article here at the Free World Survey we covered a story concerning moose. It seems the moose produce far more flatulent gas than cows. Click here to read how moose and other wild vegetarians emit global warming gases in copious quantities.

Vegans emit more flatulent green house gasses than meat-eaters. What causes flatulence?

Mammalian green house emissions are produced by the ingestion of flatulence-producing foods which are typically high in certain polysaccharides (especially oligosaccharides such as inulin) and include beans, lentils, dairy products, onions, garlic, scallions, leeks, radishes, sweet potatoes, cashews, Jerusalem artichokes, oats, wheat, yeast in breads, and other vegetables. Cauliflower, Broccoli, cabbage and other cruciferous vegetables that belong to the Brassica family are commonly reputed to not only increase flatulence, but to increase the pungency of the flatus. In beans, endogenous gases seem to arise from complex oligosaccharide (carbohydrates) that are particularly resistant to digestion by mammals, but which are readily digestible by microorganisms that inhabit the digestive tract. These oligosaccharides pass through the upper intestine largely unchanged, and when they reach the lower intestine, bacteria feed on them, producing copious amounts of flatus. In the case of those with lactose intolerance, intestinal bacteria feeding on lactose can give rise to excessive gas production when milk or lactose-containing substances have been consumed. For more documentation click here

Please note that meat does not cause flatulence! So, we give up one flatulent animal (a cow) and gain 120 other flatulent animals. (vegetarians) I don't know what volume of noxious gases are emitted by cows, but surely it cannot be more than 120 global warming chicken littles.

I have quoted this before, and I'll quote it again in the interest of saving the planet and on behalf of the sane people. Marie Antoinette would have said:

Let Them Eat Steak!

      

      

Global Warming Crime Wave - Shocker!

Yet another consequence of global warming - more crime! Oh God, why can't I be this creative?! No, you little people can't make this stuff up, only the folks at ABC are that smart. You can see for yourself - Climate change offers new criminal opportunities, experts warn

After reading the article it should be obvious what "powerful" minds are at work here. The first paragraph reads as follows;

"A meeting of global crime experts has conceded that climate change could spark criminal activities in unconventional areas." Did you catch that? They "conceded" as if to say that they were reluctant to admit it in the first place, but ABC came to the rescue and made them admit it!

This poor guy has been reduced to stealing bottled water. Curse you global warming!

So, what is the new global warming booty so alluring to thieves? - Water, copper wiring, and crystal meth. What?!!! Now, I can see where water might have something to do with global warming, but copper wire and crystal meth? These people must be on some serious drugs!

In case you didn't go to the article to see this gem in professional journalism let's take a look at the following statement from The commission's executive director of national criminal intelligence, Kevin Kitson -

"He says over the counter bans on pseudoephedrine drugs will start to restrict the availability of the main ingredient in crystal methamphetamines.

"We're seeing a change, for example, in the way in which clandestine laboratories are constructed," he said.

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, (I'm still waiting for something about global warming) blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, ...

"We're making it very much harder for them to do that." End of story.

Now I ask you where is the global warming story? There is nothing in the story that corroborates the headline! Instead the story is about crystal meth. What does crystal meth have to do with global warming?!!!

These people are real Einsteins! This is the type of hysterical idiocy our media spews daily. What in the hell are they teaching our kids in college journalism schools? It would be better if they never went to these colleges. What a waste of time and money for the parents and students. Unfortunately one must have a degree read (indoctrination) from one of the "esteemed" journalism schools in order to get a job in the mainstream media.

As far as I can tell there are more horses rear ends in the mainstream media than there are horses! Global warming equals crime increases? - give me a break! No proof, or documentation, or evidence equals no story!

How many different ways can the GW extortioners be wrong and still retain any credibility? We have cited dozens of the more blatant examples here on Free World Survey. Somehow they get by with it. If scientists in any other field of study were this cavalier and careless with the facts they would have lost all credibility long before now. The global warming "scientists" and pundits seem to have infinite latitude in ignorance and outright fraud.

The real tragedy here is that many of the GW faithful will now see a story on drug crimes involving crystal meth (the global warming drug) and equate it with proof of climate change. They will no doubt conclude that global warming is causing the drug problem. I suppose it best to stop here before I give them any more hair brained ideas.

Paradoxes Of The Global Charade Pt1

Paradoxes Of The Global Charade Pt1 - The Mass Indoctrination Phase

Let us examine some of the great yet little known paradoxes of our day. They will prove to be points of intense controversy once brought to light. These are paradoxes which you probably have not considered, but they are critically important if we are to gain awareness of the profound events which are shaping our world today.

These paradoxes have hidden in plain sight until now. The media pays them no attention whatever as if to suppress them. Why you may ask? Simply because the mention of them will upset many cherished apple carts. Our perverted social-political fabric demands that these little known self-contradictions never be brought to public knowledge. It is a sort of global charade being played out before eyes that are willing to see. To most everyone else there is nothing amiss, life goes on without questioning or even caring.

What you are about to read will either cause a new light of reason to go on or you will click away cursing me with all your liberal might and label me a hate filled heretic.

We tend to filter and judge the world around us by our preconceived ideas. These ideas or world views will largely determine how we view a certain topic or set of topics. For instance, if you are a secular progressive and believe that there is no truth then any belief system will be fair game as long as it does not conflict with your world view. How many times have you heard these worn out phrases:

1. There are no absolutes! The progressives and anarchists love to proclaim this as though professing themselves to be wise. This statement is itself both absolute and self-contradictory therefore it cannot be true.

2. There is no truth! They love this gem. Why bother saying it? If they are right, then their statement cannot possibly be true.

The point of bringing this up is to identify false logic and bad philosophy. Multitudes of college students have fallen for this terrific nonsense and had their world views altered.

"The mind that is altered, alters all"

It is by knowing this first that we will ever be able to reconcile or fathom some of the perplexing behavior and beliefs of the ultra left and other radical institutions. Likewise we will also be able to spot the charlatans more readily.

Ahead we will take each paradox one by one. While doing so please compare this with your particular world view, then compare with the world view promoted by the propaganda machine we call the major media. You may find that some of your ideas are not really your own.

Comrade Stalin (perhaps the most brutal and despotic dictator ever known) gave us a clue. (see above)

Our goal is to separate truth from propaganda. As you will see Western nations have been indoctrinated into believing falsehoods - lies. At this point you far left leaning types may still be mentally protesting that there is no truth, please stay tuned.

Let's use the time tested rules of logic used for ages to assay virtually any subject for truth. Don't bother turning to the hallowed halls of academia for verification of these axioms. You won't readily find them unless you can find a text book on logic from the 80's or before. The notion of truth has somehow become politically incorrect, and has been expunged from the very halls which should have been it's protector. (Quite a paradox in itself) These axioms of logic have fallen from popular use in modern times, but I assure you they are just as valid today as they were centuries ago. They are simply:

1. The truth is that which is.

2. The truth cannot contradict itself.

There you have it-the acid-test formula for truth. By applying these two axioms of logic we may ascertain the truth claims of most any real world matter.

Firstly we shall examine a short list of some of the more "trivial" paradoxes just to get the brain engaged and tuned into thinking critically.

#1 - There are more psychologists than ever in history to deliver us yet we have more psychological problems than ever.

#2 - Far fewer people are smoking tobacco today, and there is significantly less second hand smoke yet we have more lung cancer than before.

#3 - With over one trillion dollars per year spent on more communications devices and services people are more lonely than ever.

#4 - Pharmaceutical companies crank out more drugs to cure us everyday and we wind up with more diseases.

#5 - There are more health products and weight control programs than ever in the history of civilization yet we keep getting more overweight.

Hopefully as you read the paradoxes above you asked yourself "how can this be happening?" What conclusions can we draw from the paradoxes presented above using the rules of logic we learned earlier? Let's take each point from above and briefly deduce.

#1 Psychologists are not helping to alleviate mental illness. It would seem they are contributing to mental illness. Indeed the American Psychological Association finds (invents) new mental diseases, disorders and syndromes almost daily to diagnose therefore guaranteeing we never get better.

#2 Since we know that two thirds of those who get lung cancer are non-smokers and fewer people smoke today than in the past 100 years lung cancer must have other major causes besides tobacco. Yet the public has been led to believe that tobacco is the leading cause of lung cancer. Is this propaganda?

#3 Individuals are more well connected with others (by artificial means) than ever, yet they are lonelier than ever. Conclusion:Communications devices do not relieve loneliness, nor are they a substitute for intimate human contact as many claim.

#4 Pharmaceutical companies come up with drugs that are largely ineffective. More drugs does not mean better health for society in general. Why doesn't anyone in the media point this out? Are we again being indoctrinated? Is there a profit motive?

#5 Weight loss programs and health gimmicks do not work. We have misplaced our faith in technology. Again I will ask, why aren't we told to stop wasting our time and money on these scams? What is going on?

Are you beginning to see a common thread in the paradoxes we have briefly examined above? Behind each of the examples above lie powerful money interests that rely upon indoctrination to keep us on their perpetual treadmills. To cure problems such as mental diseases, obesity, cancer, or loneliness is anathema to them. Don't expect the truth from the media who runs their ads and derives most of their income from these mega corporations and powerful interests.

When was the last time you saw the major media expose the myth of weight loss gimmicks, or the ineffectiveness of modern psychology?

Now let's take a look at some more paradoxes but this time I want you to reach your own conclusions. They are:

More money on education than ever before and yet the highest illiteracy rate in US history.

More money on the decades old war on drugs and more illegal drugs than ever.

More money on the war on poverty and more poverty.

More drug abuse programs and more drug abuse than ever.

More breast cancer prevention and detection yet more breast cancer.

More cholesterol awareness, drugs, and prevention yet more heart disease.

Are we being told the truth? Or, are we being systematically lied to? Again each of the points above involve multi-billion dollar enterprises both private and government sector.

Ahead we will be looking at many more paradoxes which will expose many more of the insidious lies and manipulation deliberately targeting the public at large.

Please come back for a more penetrating examination of the global charade in part two of this series.

      

      

Global Warming Hoax Exposed: Polar Bears In Peril

Another Global Warming Hoax Exposed: Polar Bears In Peril - On The Brink Of Extinction

I don't want to elaborate on this expose too much for fear I may take away from the overall message of the video below. The message here is loud and clear. The global warming fanatic fringe will concoct, foment, advance, endorse, coddle, and promote any lie no matter how brazen or manipulative in order to further their agenda. The proof is in the video below.



Now we should be asking; why don't we see any reporting exposing this outright fraud? Why isn't anyone confronting Al Gore on this inconvenient lie? Are forces conspiring? You bet!!! When the truth is suppressed on such a large scale as seen in the video above you can be sure much mischief is well afoot.

So, we can be good global citizens and just pretend not to see the truth here, or we can acknowledge it and tell those we care about. Tell them the truth. They/we are being indoctrinated!

The global warming crowd lies, deceives, and manipulates the masses (as seen in the articles on this blog) constantly and unashamedly. This is not the spirit of love or caring. They are not lovers of truth or even their fellow man as they would have everyone believe. In all forms of human relations love and respect are built upon the foundations of truth and transparency.

They are like an abusive spouse who when caught in lies attack out of fear of being exposed. Their position is based in fear and loathing of their fellow man. Just listen to the way they indict humanity for all of the worlds problems real or not. You never hear anything positive about humanity from them. They are the haters!

Remember that if the good people do nothing the abusive fanatics will win just as Hitler proved. Silence is consent!