Children Ruining The Planet! - Adding To Global Warming!

Once I began reading this alarmist story I couldn't put it down. It was such a fascinating piece of fiendish propaganda I was in awe. The journalistic fraud and scientific quackery here is as stunning as it is ghoulish.

Large Families Ruining the Planet, Environmentalists Claim This from Britain’s Optimum Population Trust (OPT). In order to stop global warming, people should recycle, drive smaller cars and limit procreation.

“The most effective personal climate-change strategy is limiting the number of children one has,” the report states. “The most effective national and global climate-change strategy is limiting the size of the population.” Does this sound familiar? Does communist China ring a bell?

John Guillebaud, co-chairman of OPT, claimed if a couple has two children instead of three, it cuts the family's carbon dioxide output by the equivalent of 620 return flights from London to New York each year. Did you catch that? 620 flights per year? Let's do a little math! Their fuzzy outlandish math always intrigues me. (Not really)

The average person uses about 1.3 gallons (US) of gas per day. If we cut one child out of the family we will save at most 1.3 gallons per day (approximately 420 gallons/year). If that child lives the expected 78 years he or she will use 32,760 gallons over a lifetime. (As long as they are not Al Gore who has used millions.)

Commercial airliners bound from London to New York use a lot of fuel. The larger the aircraft the more fuel consumption. (Generally speaking) Let us assume John Guillebaud, co-chairman of OPT was referring to a smaller commercial airliner. A Boeing 757 will burn about 15,000 gallons (US) with a light payload. At 620 trips we can estimate the fuel consumption to equal 9,300,000 gallons. Now we must bear in mind that Mr. Guillebaud said that one child less will cut this amount each year!

Only Al Gore could use this much fuel each year and get away with it. A baby has no chance. The global warming fanatics would be and are calling for it's extermination. What other gems do they have in store for us ignorant readers?

"The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude (an order of magnitude?) greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights,” he said. “The decision to have children should be seen as a very big one and one that should take the environment into account.” In the western European nations we already have less than two children per household! Why doesn't he take his message to Mexico or some other third world nation where they have large families?

What is their agenda? Population control? Do they want to reduce the population of western nations even more? You can count on it! These people are fellow travelers and comrades of "responsible nations" such as communist China.

China says one-child policy helps protect climate Source: Reuters

Some scientists say that draconian birth control measures such as China's are wrongly overlooked in the fight against climate change, when the world population is projected to soar to about 9 billion by 2050 from 6.6 billion now. For those who don't know China has a global friendly policy of forced abortions for anyone daring to defile mother Earth with another baby. Are these ghoulish kooks suggesting that we adopt forced abortions and mandatory sterilization of women just like good old China? Let's see what the head of the U.N. Climate Change Secretariat has to say.

"Population is clearly an important factor," (In global warming) said Yvo de Boer, head of the U.N. Climate Change Secretariat, at U.N. talks trying to plan a new deal to combat climate change after 2012. Did you catch that? The U.N. is trying to plan a new deal (concerning population) to combat climate change.

“This is the extreme, utterly bizarre end of the environmental movement that you see in science fiction movies,” Dan Gainor, director of the Business & Media Institute said. “That’s how they view human beings – but conveniently never themselves. They think they’re the great enlightened ones.” How true!

This policy of depopulation of sacred mother Earth is near and dear to the U.N. Your babies or future babies are in their sights.

This sort of outrageous propaganda should be labeled by all as a tell of the demonic agenda planned ahead. I say:

"Get the U.N. out of the US now!

Global Warming Schizophrenia

Sometimes I feel schizophrenic when I read all of the self-contradictory pro-global warming studies, stories, hysterical rants, and UN proclamations. I just don’t know how the GW faithful do it! They tell us more hurricanes, less hurricanes, coral reefs grow, coral reefs shrink, and the list grows everyday. It is through the chaos of these stories that the truth is striving to be told. It tears little by little through the weave of their web which has caught many unawares. As much as they try, they can't mend their web of deceit forever.

Let's take a closer look at how abundant these self-contradictory claims are within the GW cult. The list below is not complete, their dire and contradictory claims are too many to count. However this will give us good insight into the schizophrenia of the GW faithful.

Normally a good movie producer will hire a professional (Script Continuity Editor) to ensure the
integrity of the story line. Making sure that the message and historicity of the movie are accurate and do not conflict with the facts either external (real world) or internal (story line). Now the continuity is important in the script because we want to stay in the same universe as our viewers.

You wouldn't want to have say, a WW ll fighter pilot flying a P-51 Mustang one minute and when the camera comes back around he's flying an F-15c Eagle. Or, you wouldn't want that pilot dying in an aerial combat scene, but is shown alive and well back on base minutes later. Yet, this is exactly what is happening in the different universe of the global warming cult. Even if they knew, the faithful are not allowed to talk about it, or even let anyone else talk about it.

I will get tons of hate comments from the cult faithful for bringing this up, but it is a matter that cannot be overlooked if we are to even pretend to be open-minded. They hate, yes hate anyone who has any objection to their sacred sacrament of global warming. This is for your eyes. They will not see as they have been blinded by so called "science."

99 percent of the faithful will not have read this far and will have just jumped to post nasty comments or hastily click away. Their pathological disdain is really a phenomenon of recent history. The only other parallel of such zealous hate would be the Nazis of pre-WW ll Germany. Surely you have seen or felt their fangs of criticism in comment boards and on their websites.

What is the essence of our controversy? Stay with me for an expose which will prove profoundly penetrating and sound in conclusion.

Firstly, let us agree on a few necessary points. (Sometimes called the rules of logic)

1. Truth is that which cannot contradict itself.

2. Truth is that which is.

Now, let us reason together. If (in the real world) we have information that is self-contradictory then we know that it cannot possibly be true.

Ahead we have a list of contradictory claims by various global warming "experts." Each item has a link which I hope you will follow to see their claims in their own words for yourself to verify that I am giving you accurate information.

Predictions of global warming "experts" - Take your pick

avalanches reduced, or avalanches increased,

coral reefs grow, or coral reefs shrink

desert advance, or desert retreat,

Earth slowing down, or Earth spins faster,

fish catches drop, or fish catches rise,

forest decline, or forest expansion,

glacial retreat, or glacial growth,

hurricanes increase, or hurricane reduction,

ice sheet growth, or ice sheet shrinkage,

plankton blooms, or plankton loss,

rainfall increase, or rainfall reduction,

salinity reduction, or salinity increase,

snowfall increase, or snowfall reduction,

trees less colorful, or trees more colorful,

The "experts" claim that their climate change models have vindicated them and proven global
warming is a fact. Why do they say this? Because, they say the predictions made by their climate models have been so very accurate.

Now watch this carefully, for some folks this is tough stuff. Let's use a bit of the logic we hopefully learned by the time we graduated kindergarten. If you make computer predictions that a coin will come up heads or tails when it lands you will be right 99.9999% of the time. This is exactly what they have done with global warming. When there is a drought it is global warming. When there is a flood it is climate change. When it is unseasonably hot it is global warming. When there is a cold snap it is climate change.

It is important to note that the words used cover all possible contingencies. Notice that in the
winter when there is a cold snap they do not blame it on global warming, no, now it is climate change. This is sophistry meant to keep the faithful from questioning their own hallowed theory. What possible motives can we assign to these word games? It can only be deliberately planned deception.

Someone has thought this out. It cannot have happened spontaneously out of relative chaos.
Everyone (the faithful) seems to understand the rules of the word games of global warming somehow. How can this be? The faithful were never taught this in any classroom or forum. This can only be the result of brainwashing. If so, the planning must have been even more thorough than we have given the architects credit for.

Now the show stopper. The part I know you were waiting for. If "scientific" claims or
predictions are self-contradictory then they cannot possibly be based on the truth.

Global warming, or climate change can only have been an engineered hoax.

Global Warming Hoax Exposed: Polar Bears In Peril

Another Global Warming Hoax Exposed: Polar Bears In Peril - On The Brink Of Extinction

I don't want to elaborate on this expose too much for fear I may take away from the overall message of the video below. The message here is loud and clear. The global warming fanatic fringe will concoct, foment, advance, endorse, coddle, and promote any lie no matter how brazen or manipulative in order to further their agenda. The proof is in the video below.



Now we should be asking; why don't we see any reporting exposing this outright fraud? Why isn't anyone confronting Al Gore on this inconvenient lie? Are forces conspiring? You bet!!! When the truth is suppressed on such a large scale as seen in the video above you can be sure much mischief is well afoot.

So, we can be good global citizens and just pretend not to see the truth here, or we can acknowledge it and tell those we care about. Tell them the truth. They/we are being indoctrinated!

The global warming crowd lies, deceives, and manipulates the masses (as seen in the articles on this blog) constantly and unashamedly. This is not the spirit of love or caring. They are not lovers of truth or even their fellow man as they would have everyone believe. In all forms of human relations love and respect are built upon the foundations of truth and transparency.

They are like an abusive spouse who when caught in lies attack out of fear of being exposed. Their position is based in fear and loathing of their fellow man. Just listen to the way they indict humanity for all of the worlds problems real or not. You never hear anything positive about humanity from them. They are the haters!

Remember that if the good people do nothing the abusive fanatics will win just as Hitler proved. Silence is consent!

      

      

    

Fuzzy Math of Climate Change - Astounding!

Let's take a quick tour of some blatant journalistic malpractice and outright scientific bankruptcy surrounding global warming! What you are about to read can only be categorized as propaganda, it certainly is not journalism or science! The problem is that it comes with a color of authority from respected media. I wonder if anyone noticed the outlandish fuzzy math used in the first global warming article below? The editor, author, and contributing scientists certainly didn't seem to notice or care. Or did they?

This from the "Respected Scotsman News" Mon 30 Jul 2007 Quoting as follows:

Hurricane count doubles

"A DRAMATIC increase in the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes and tropical storms can be fully explained only by global warming, scientists said yesterday. (What scientists?-Who? This looks credible already.)

In the past 100 years, the average number of tropical cyclones forming in the Atlantic each year has doubled. Of these, roughly 55 per cent have been powerful enough to be categorised as hurricanes."

Did you catch that? Here it is again, now watch close. "In the past 100 years, the average number of tropical cyclones forming in the Atlantic each year has doubled." Here is where you really have to be a world class scientist to understand the astounding dangers of global warming.

If the average number of tropical cyclones is doubling each year then after 100 years we would have more cyclones every year than there are grains of sand on all of the world's beaches! Let's do some of the math.

For example:

Year 1 = 1 Cyclone
Year 2 = 2 Cyclones
Year 3 = 4 Cyclones
Year 4 = 8 Cyclones
Year 5 = 16 Cyclones
Year 6 = 32 Cyclones
Year 7 = 64 Cyclones
Year 8 = 128 Cyclones
Year 9 = 256 Cyclones
Year 10 = 512 Cyclones
Year 11 = 1,024 Cyclones
Year 12 = 2,048 Cyclones
Year 13 = 4,096 Cyclones
Year 14 = 8,192 Cyclones
Year 15 = 16,384 Cyclones
Year 16 = 32,768 Cyclones
Year 17 = 65,536 Cyclones
Year 18 = 131,072 Cyclones
Year 19 = 262,144 Cyclones
Year 20 = 524,288 Cyclones
Year 21 = 1,048,576 Cyclones
Year 22 = 2,097,152 Cyclones

Now, only a true global warming scientist (such as the ones who colluded on this article) could ever wrap his mind around this stuff! Below is the average day in the summer of 1919 according to the "scientific" data above. Hawaii was hit by a typhoon every 16 hours on average and in 1920 they were hit by one every 8 hours. I did not know there were so many hurricanes back then! Where are they now?



Now, we still have 78 years to go, but you get the picture. This is an asinine statement that only blinded true believers could digest. Unfortunately most readers will just gloss over this brazen lie without noticing. Yet, others will continue to spew this idiocy as another global warming plank with which to beat the deniers over the head as though it were a fact. In this dumbed down world no amount of reasoned refutation will sway their stubborn orthodoxy.

This wild statistical slight of hand and propaganda from the global warming ministers is the most powerful argument I know of for instilling fluency of math and logic in our children. The useful idiots wallowing in and spewing this junk science cannot think for themselves and are lost. Our next generation does not have to suffer this fate if we can just wake up before it's too late. The faithful of the climate change shaman will prove that ignorance is a costly virtue in the brave new world.

Where have all of the cyclones and hurricanes been for the past two years? We should have had more not less if the global warming ministers and their faithful are correct even in the least. The propagandists boast that their predictive models are accurate. What nonsense, what incredible nonsense!

Please indulge me for a moment and take a look at this from LiveScience another ever spewing fount of self-contradiction. They state: “All science is fallible,” Oreskes told LiveScience. “Climate science shouldn't be expected to stand up to some fantasy standard that no science can live up to.” (So much for global warming being a "certain fact" as Al Gore and "the scientists" are fond of crowing.)

Instead, a variety of methods and standards are used to evaluate the viability of different scientific explanations and theories. One such standard is how well a theory predicts the outcome of an event, and climate change theory has proven to be a strong predictor." End of quote. A strong predictor? Where are all of the devastating hurricanes you had the faithful so hysterical about?

The "journalist" and "scientists" who conspired to crank out this obscene nonsense are either liars, or are incompetent or both. I believe they are both.

Unfortunately the global warming hysteria is built on one asinine plank after another that somehow got constructed into a paradoxical house of global warming worship.

Perhaps the real paradox here is that I will be the one who is denounced as the liar and denier of the "facts"!