Children Ruining The Planet! - Adding To Global Warming!

Once I began reading this alarmist story I couldn't put it down. It was such a fascinating piece of fiendish propaganda I was in awe. The journalistic fraud and scientific quackery here is as stunning as it is ghoulish.

Large Families Ruining the Planet, Environmentalists Claim This from Britain’s Optimum Population Trust (OPT). In order to stop global warming, people should recycle, drive smaller cars and limit procreation.

“The most effective personal climate-change strategy is limiting the number of children one has,” the report states. “The most effective national and global climate-change strategy is limiting the size of the population.” Does this sound familiar? Does communist China ring a bell?

John Guillebaud, co-chairman of OPT, claimed if a couple has two children instead of three, it cuts the family's carbon dioxide output by the equivalent of 620 return flights from London to New York each year. Did you catch that? 620 flights per year? Let's do a little math! Their fuzzy outlandish math always intrigues me. (Not really)

The average person uses about 1.3 gallons (US) of gas per day. If we cut one child out of the family we will save at most 1.3 gallons per day (approximately 420 gallons/year). If that child lives the expected 78 years he or she will use 32,760 gallons over a lifetime. (As long as they are not Al Gore who has used millions.)

Commercial airliners bound from London to New York use a lot of fuel. The larger the aircraft the more fuel consumption. (Generally speaking) Let us assume John Guillebaud, co-chairman of OPT was referring to a smaller commercial airliner. A Boeing 757 will burn about 15,000 gallons (US) with a light payload. At 620 trips we can estimate the fuel consumption to equal 9,300,000 gallons. Now we must bear in mind that Mr. Guillebaud said that one child less will cut this amount each year!

Only Al Gore could use this much fuel each year and get away with it. A baby has no chance. The global warming fanatics would be and are calling for it's extermination. What other gems do they have in store for us ignorant readers?

"The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude (an order of magnitude?) greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights,” he said. “The decision to have children should be seen as a very big one and one that should take the environment into account.” In the western European nations we already have less than two children per household! Why doesn't he take his message to Mexico or some other third world nation where they have large families?

What is their agenda? Population control? Do they want to reduce the population of western nations even more? You can count on it! These people are fellow travelers and comrades of "responsible nations" such as communist China.

China says one-child policy helps protect climate Source: Reuters

Some scientists say that draconian birth control measures such as China's are wrongly overlooked in the fight against climate change, when the world population is projected to soar to about 9 billion by 2050 from 6.6 billion now. For those who don't know China has a global friendly policy of forced abortions for anyone daring to defile mother Earth with another baby. Are these ghoulish kooks suggesting that we adopt forced abortions and mandatory sterilization of women just like good old China? Let's see what the head of the U.N. Climate Change Secretariat has to say.

"Population is clearly an important factor," (In global warming) said Yvo de Boer, head of the U.N. Climate Change Secretariat, at U.N. talks trying to plan a new deal to combat climate change after 2012. Did you catch that? The U.N. is trying to plan a new deal (concerning population) to combat climate change.

“This is the extreme, utterly bizarre end of the environmental movement that you see in science fiction movies,” Dan Gainor, director of the Business & Media Institute said. “That’s how they view human beings – but conveniently never themselves. They think they’re the great enlightened ones.” How true!

This policy of depopulation of sacred mother Earth is near and dear to the U.N. Your babies or future babies are in their sights.

This sort of outrageous propaganda should be labeled by all as a tell of the demonic agenda planned ahead. I say:

"Get the U.N. out of the US now!

Global Warping part l

Of course the global warming debate is known by most everyone, but how well known? Ahead we shall take a look at some extraordinary yet little known examples of hyperbole and brazen lies that have somehow become planks of their platform. It is important to identify them, discredit them, expose them, and terminate them from our consciousness.

One might think that the following would be an immediate show stopper for the global warming fanatics, but no evidence no matter how powerful will ever sway their opinions.

It has been shown that other planets in our solar system are warming. The Martian ice caps are melting even faster than here on Earth. This is direct evidence that the Sun is causing global warming, and there is nothing we can do about it. Does this register with them? No, they claim that this is because the other planets such as Mars and Jupiter are closer to the Sun than the Earth. This is how desperate they are to blame humanity. They would much rather believe a lie than the truth. We have been put on trial and been found guilty without even a debate! The
evidence is far from in yet they say the time for debate is over, end of story. How convenient for them.

Who are the most ardent purveyors of these lies? David Mayer de Rothschild is the youngest child (born 1978) of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, of the British wing of the Rothschild banking family. The Live Earth kingpin David Mayer de Rothschild totally dismantled his own credibility on national radio as Live Earth propaganda bandwagon was a massive flop. Rothschild's recent book, 77 Essential Skills to Stop Climate Changes, calls for ordinary people to limit outward behavior and even work at home and was used as part of the PR blitz to accompany the Live Earth project. Mr. Rothschild is ultra-wealthy and has a carbon footprint bigger than the state of Texas, yet he wants us to conserve! And the band drones on with "don't shoot the messenger."

What hypocrites! No, they give hypocrisy a bad name.

When questioned by Alex Jones on a national radio talk show Rothschild reacted to the point about massive climate change on every planet of the solar system and its relation to natural sun cycles by claiming Mars, Saturn and Jupiter were closer to the sun than Earth!

Of course the global warming bunch are not fazed by such ignorance, but will press the lies even harder. I must admit that it is a fast and clever lie for his constituents who have been dumbed down and cannot know any better. If ever there were a great arguement for the importance of
education this is it. Uneducated people can be made to believe absurdities. No matter how much they claim that Saturn is closer to the Sun it won't make it true.

Here's an article from the BBC: February 13, 1998
Scientists blame sun for global warming

"Climate changes such as global warming may be due to changes in the sun rather than to the release of greenhouse gases on Earth. Climatologists and astronomers speaking at the American
Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Philadelphia say the present warming may be unusual - but a mini ice age could soon follow.

The sun provides all the energy that drives our climate, but it is not the constant star it might seem. Careful studies over the last 20 years show that its overall brightness and energy output increases slightly as sunspot activity rises to the peak of its 11-year cycle."

From National Geographic News: February 28, 2007
Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming,

"Scientist Says

Simultaneous warming on Earth and Mars suggests that our planet's recent climate changes have a natural—and not a human-induced—cause, according to one scientist's controversial theory.

Earth is currently experiencing rapid warming, which the vast majority of climate scientists says is due to humans pumping huge amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Mars, too, appears to be enjoying more mild and balmy temperatures.

In 2005 data from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a
row.

Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of space research at St. Petersburg's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia, says the Mars data is evidence that the current global warming on Earth is being caused by changes in the sun. 'The long-term increase in solar irradiance is heating both Earth and Mars,' he said."

While speaking to a woman who was a true man-made global warming believer I opined that global warming may be caused by the Sun. There is good evidence for this from solid scientific sources I said. She replied indignantly "I don't believe the Earth is warmed by the Sun, it would be known by scientists!"

This from
LiveScience: 12 March 2007

"Global warming on Neptune's moon Triton as well as Jupiter and Pluto, and now Mars has some scientists scratching their heads over what could possibly be in common with the warming
of all these planets ... Could there be something in common with all the planets in our solar system that might cause them all to warm at the same time?"

Of course the global warming doomsdayers have a very convoluted answer for this incredible coincidence of simultaneous solar system heating which I will not go into. It is too baffling for my tiny mind to fully appreciate. They must have gone to college a long, long time to get so dumb.;)

So let's see, all of the planets are warming but it's not caused by the Sun? Wow,I guess (using their logic) it must be my Accord. But then again it could be Al Gore's fleet of private jets and SUVs.



The Kyoto protocol excludes 129 developing nations, such as China, India, Brazil and South Korea (the 2nd, 4th, 10th and 11th largest economies) from limiting green house gas emissions. Every 10 days China starts up a new coal-burning electrical generating station big enough to power San Diego; 2,200 of these will be build by 2030. No amount of reduction by the US could possibly outweigh this addition. Developing countries such as India also will be adding an incredible amount of green house emissions as well. Why aren't the global warming drones attacking them?

The Los Angeles Times recently reported that by 2010 one third of California's air pollution will be from China! Why don't they go after their comrades in communist China? When we look at the global warming agenda and plans for sustainable development the answer should be clear. This is about power and redistribution of wealth. If they have their way it will come in the
form of imposed carbon credits and taxes for targeted polluters (US and Europe) but not for China, Indonesia, or India who produce more pollution by far than the US.

Of course the planned global warming taxes and credits will be enforced. (taken by force) We used to call this robbery. Not only are the global warming fringe clueless, but lawless as well.